Omnipotent God or Good God??

Before i start writing anything, i ought to warn the readers beforehand that anyone who is sufficiently satisfied with his or her concept of god and other related religios stuff need not read any further. this is my effort to cater to those eternal questions of the rationalists who have ever been confused whether to believe in the prevailing definition of god or not. what i write further is based on a simple analogy. what i want to prove is that God cannot be both omnipotent and GOOD at the same time. and if i succeed in proving this, it wud b a direct contradiction of the basic definition of god. consider this example -
you are standing outside a burning house wearing a fire proof jacket. u have all the other required resources which provide u the ultimate the ultimate fire resistance and u have no fear whatsoever of fire. now suppose u know that there is a small child inside the burning house whom u can easily save, provided your fire protection. what wud be your most spontaneous action at that moment. surely u wudn't think twice before going in and saving the child. given the omnipotence of GOD, as per the popular beliefs go, what do u expect god to do when he sees the millions here suffering from AIDS and other similar diseases. doesn't it become his responsibility to save the victims rather than leave them to die. You wud surely save the child and not leave him to burn to ashes so as to give the people an 'example' that one shudn't leave their gas cylinder's nozzles open so as to avoid fire. doesn't the same applies to god as well.
So this directly proves that either God is not Omnipotent and doesn't have resources to help the victims of AIDS or he is not Good. in either case he is not God. replies will be acknowledged.